Share:
  Guess poet | Poets | Poets timeline | Isles | Contacts

Alfred Noyes - Five CritcismsAlfred Noyes - Five Critcisms
Work rating: Low


I. (_On many recent novels by the conventional unconventionalists_.) Old Pantaloon, lean-witted, dour and rich,   After grim years of soul-destroying greed, Weds Columbine, that April-blooded witch   "Too young" to know that gold was not her need. Then enters Pierrot, young, rebellious, warm,   With well-lined purse, to teach the fine-souled wife That the old fool`s gold should aid a world-reform   (Confused with sex). This wrecks the old fool`s life. O, there`s no doubt that Pierrot was clever,   Quick to break hearts and quench the dying flame; But why, for his own pride, does Pierrot never   Choose his own mate, work for his own high aim, Stand on his feet, and pay for his own tune? Why scold, cheat, rob and kill poor Pantaloon? II. (_On a certain goddess, acclaimed as "new" but known in Babylon._) I saw the assembled artists of our day   Waiting for light, for music and for song. A woman stood before them, fresh as May   And beautiful; but, in that modish throng, None heeded her. They said, "In our first youth   Surely, long since, your hair was touched with grey." "I do not change," she answered. "I am Truth."   "Old and banal," they sneered, and turned away. Then came a formless thing, with breasts dyed scarlet.   The roses in her hair were green and blue.     "I am new," she said. "I change, and       Death knows why." Then with the eyes and gesture of a harlot   She led them all forth, whinneying, "New, how new!     Tell us your name!" She answered, "The       New Lie." III. (_On Certain of the Bolsheviki "Idealists."_) With half the force and thought you waste in rage   Over your neighbor`s house, or heart of stone, You might have built your own new heritage,   O fools, have you no hands, then, of your own? Where is your pride? Is this your answer still,   This the red flag that burns above our strife, This the new cry that rings from Pisgah hill,   "_Our neighbor`s money, or our neighbor`s life_"? Be prouder. Let us build that nobler state   With our own hands, with our own muscle and brain! Your very victories die in hymns of hate;   And your own envies are your heaviest chain. Is there no rebel proud enough to say   "We`ll stand on our own feet, and win the day"? IV. (_On Certain Realists._) You with the quick sardonic eye For all the mockeries of life, Beware, in this dark masque of things that seem, Lest even that tragic irony, Which you discern in this our mortal strife, Trick you and trap you, also, with a dream. Last night I saw a dead man borne along The city streets, passing a boisterous throng That never ceased to laugh and shout and dance: And yet, and yet, For all the poison bitter minds might brew From themes like this, I knew That the stern Truth would not permit her glance Thus to be foiled by flying straws of chance, For her keen eyes on deeper skies are set, And laws that tragic ironists forget. She saw the dead man`s life, from birth to death,-- All that he knew of love and sin and pain, Success and failure (not as this world sees), His doubts, his passions, inner loss and gain, And borne on darker tides of constant law Beyond the margin of this life she saw All that had left his body with the breath. These things, to her, were still realities. If any mourned for him unseen, She saw them, too. If none, she`d not pretend His clay were colder, or his God less true, Or that his grave, at length, would be less green. She`d not deny The boundless depths of her eternal sky Brooding above a boundless universe, Because he seemed to man`s unseeing eye Going a little further to fare worse; Nor would she assume he lacked that unseen friend Whom even the tragic ironists declare Were better than the seen, in his last end. Oh, then, beware, beware, Lest in the strong name of "reality" You mock yourselves anew with shapes of air, Lest it be you, agnostics, who re-write The fettering creeds of night, Affirm you know your own Unknowable, And lock the wingéd soul in a new hell; Lest it be you, lip-worshippers of Truth, Who break the heart of youth; Lest it be you, the realists, who fight With shadows, and forget your own pure light; Lest it be you who, with a little shroud Snatched from the sightless faces of the dead, Hoodwink the world, and keep the mourner bowed In dust, real dust, with stones, real stones, for bread; Lest, as you look one eighth of an inch beneath The yellow skin of death, You dream yourselves discoverers of the skull That old _memento mori_ of our faith; Lest it be you who hunt a flying wraith Through this dissolving stuff of hill and cloud; Lest it be you, who, at the last, annul Your covenant with your kind; Lest it be you who darken heart and mind, Sell the strong soul in bondage to a dream, And fetter us once more to things that seem. V (_An Answer_) [After reading an article in a leading London journal by an "intellectual" who attacked one of the noblest poets and greatest artists of a former century (or any century) on the ground that his high ethical standards were incompatible with the new lawlessness. This vicious lawlessness the writer described definitely, and he paid his tribute to dishonour as openly and brutally as any of the Bolsheviki could have done. I had always known that this was the real ground of the latter-day onslaught on some of the noblest literature of the past; but I had never seen it openly confessed before. The time has now surely come when, if our civilization is to make any fight at all against the new "red ruin and breaking up of laws," we must cease to belaud our slack-minded, latter-day "literature of rebellion" for its cleverness in making scraps of paper out of the plain laws of right and wrong. It has been doing this for more than twenty-five years, and the same has become fashionable among those who are too busy to read carefully or understand fully what pitfalls are being prepared for their own feet and the feet of their children.] I If this were true, England indeed were dead.   If the wild fashion of that poisonous hour   Wherein the new Salome, clothed with power, Wriggled and hissed, with hands and feet so red, Should even now demand that glorious head,   Whose every word was like an English flower,   Whose every song an English April shower, Whose every thought immortal wine and bread; If this were true, if England should prefer   Darkness, corruption, and the adulterous crew, Shakespeare and Browning would cry shame on her,   And Milton would deny the land he knew; And those who died in Flanders yesterday Would thank their God they sleep in cleaner clay. II It is not true. Only these "rebel" wings,   These glittering clouds of "intellectual" flies   Out of the stagnant pools of midnight rise From the old dead creeds, with carrion-poisoned stings   They strike at noble and ignoble things,   Immortal Love with the old world`s out-worn lies,   But even now, a wind from clearer skies Dissolves in smoke their coteries and wings. See, their divorced idealist re-divorces   The wife he stole from his own stealing friend! And _these_ would pluck the high stars from their courses,   And mock the fools that praise them, till the end! Well, let the whole world praise them. Truth can wait Till our new England shall unlock the gate. III Yes. Let the fools go paint themselves with woad,   For we`ve a jest between us, Truth and I.   We know that those who live by fashion die Also by fashion, and that mode kills mode. We know the great new age is on the road,   And death is at the heart of every lie.   But we`ve a jest between us, Truth and I. And we have locked the doors to our abode. Yet if some great new "rebel" in his pride   Should pass that way and hear us laughing low Like lovers, in the darkness, side by side,   He might catch this:--"The dullards do not know That names are names. New `rebel` is old `thrall.`" And we`re the lonely dreamers after all.
Source

The script ran 0.002 seconds.