Share:
  Guess poet | Poets | Poets timeline | Isles | Contacts

Lewis Carroll - Hunting Of The Snark: Preface Lewis Carroll - Hunting Of The Snark: Preface
Work rating: Low


PREFACE   If—-and the thing is wildly possible—-t he charge of writing   nonsense were ever brought against the author of this brief but   instructive poem, it would be based, I feel convinced, on the line     ``Then the bowsprit got mixed with the rudder sometimes``   In view of this painful possibility,  I will not (as I might) appeal   indignantly to my other writings as a proof that I am incapable of   such a deed: I will not (as I might) point to the strong moral   purpose of this poem itself, to the arithmetical  principles so   cautiously inculcated in it, or to its noble teachings in Natural   History—-I will take the more prosaic course of simply explaining   how it happened.   The Bellman, who was almost morbidly sensitive about appearances,    used to have the bowsprit unshipped once or twice a week to be   revarnished,  and it more than once happened, when the time came for   replacing it, that no one on board could remember which end of the   ship it belonged to. They knew it was not of the slightest use to   appeal to the Bellman about it—-he would only refer to his Naval   Code, and read out in pathetic tones Admiralty Instructions  which   none of them had ever been able to understand— -so it generally ended   in its being fastened on, anyhow, across the rudder. The helmsman   used to stand by with tears in his eyes: he knew it was all wrong,   but alas! Rule 42 of the Code, ``No one shall speak to the Man at the   Helm``, had been completed by the Bellman himself with the words   ``and the Man at the Helm shall speak to no one``. So remonstrance    was impossible, and no steering could be done till the next   varnishing day. During these bewildering intervals the ship usually   sailed backwards.     This office was usually undertaken by the Boots, who found in it   a refuge from the Baker`s constant complaints about the insufficient    blacking of his three pairs of boots.   As this poem is to some extent connected with the lay of the   Jabberwock, let me take this opportunity of answering a question that   has often been asked me, how to pronounce ``slithy toves``. The   ``i`` in ``slithy`` is long, as in ``writhe``; and ``toves`` is   pronounced so as to rhyme with ``groves``. Again, the first ``o`` in   ``borogoves` ` is pronounced like the ``o`` in ``borrow``. I have   heard people try to give it the sound of the ``o`` in ``worry``.   Such is Human Perversity.   This also seems a fitting occasion to notice the other hard words in   that poem. Humpty-Dumpt y`s theory, of two meanings packed into one   word like a portmanteau,  seems to me the right explanation for all.   For instance, take the two words ``fuming`` and ``furious``.  Make up   your mind that you will say both words, but leave it unsettled which   you will say first. Now open your mouth and speak. If your thoughts   incline ever so little towards ``fuming``, you will say   ``fuming-fur ious``; if they turn, by even a hair`s breadth, towards   ``furious``,  you will say ``furious-fu ming``; but if you have that   rarest of gifts, a perfectly balanced mind, you will say   ``frumious`` .   Supposing that, when Pistol uttered the well-known words—-     ``Under which king, Bezonian? Speak or die!``   Justice Shallow had felt certain that it was either William or   Richard, but had not been able to settle which, so that he could not   possibly say either name before the other, can it be doubted that,   rather than die, he would have gasped out ``Rilchiam!` `. `Lewis Carroll`
Source

The script ran 0.001 seconds.